Piled with Jack cheese and slices of real Applewood smoked bacon. Served on a toasted bun with smoky chipotle spread, lettuce, tomato, onion and pickles.
Cowboy Burger. Head out west and grab this burger topped with crispy onion strings, melted white cheddar cheese, and applewood smoked bacon, served on a toasted bun with southern BBQ sauce, lettuce, tomato, onion, and pickles. Quesadilla Burger. Bacon Cheddar Cheesburger. Served with lettuce, tomato, onion and pickles. Philly Cheesesteak. Served on a toasted hoagie roll. Roast Beef, Bacon and Mushroom Melt. It's all served on thick sliced bread with melted Swiss cheese.
- Table of contents!
- Transformers: All Hail Megatron Vol. 4.
- Der Waldbrand (German Edition).
Chicken Fajita Rollup. Smoky chipotle chicken rolled in a flour tortilla with melted Monterey Jack and cheddar cheeses, shredded lettuce and pico de gallo. Served with Mexi-ranch dipping sauce. Classic Clubhouse Grille. Piled high with Virginia ham, shaved turkey, melted cheddar and Jack cheeses with Applewood smoked bacon, lettuce, tomato, mayo and a drizzle of our signature honey BBQ.
Served on our toasted bakery bread. Fiesta Chicken Chopped Salad. Bruschetta Chicken Salad. A grilled chicken breast on crisp romaine tossed with champagne vinaigrette. Finished with Kalamata olives, roasted red peppers, bruschetta, red onions, Asiago cheese, golden fried mozzarella scoops and balsamic glaze.
Seasonal Berry and Spinach Salad. Spinach leaves tossed in our strawberry vinaigrette. Layered with juicy blueberries, sliced strawberries, grilled chicken breast, bleu cheese crumbles and honey-glazed pecans. Grilled Shrimp 'N Spinach Salad. Tender spinach, crisp bacon, roasted red peppers, red onions, toasted almonds and hot bacon vinaigrette topped with grilled shrimp.
Grilled Chicken Caesar Salad. Juicy grilled chicken breast over crisp romaine lettuce tossed in our garlic Caesar dressing. Topped with challah croutons and Parmesan cheese. Oriental Chicken Salad. Fresh Asian greens tossed in a tasty Oriental vinaigrette and topped with crispy noodles, toasted almonds and golden fried chicken tenders. Fried Chicken Salad. Juicy breaded chicken, Jack-cheddar, tomatoes and eggs on fresh salad greens.
Served with Dijon honey mustard dressing. Grilled Jalapeno Lime Shrimp. A hearty portion of grilled chipotle lime shrimp and black bean corn salsa tossed with lime juice and chopped cilantro, served on a mix of grilled zucchini, marinated tomatoes, onions and red peppers with steamed white rice. Creamy Parmesan Chicken. Our juicy grilled chicken breast with creamy au gratin Parmesan sauce. Served with steamed spinach and mushroom rice pilaf. Garlic marinated 7 oz. Spicy chili sauce meets under tender grilled chicken and colorful asian style vegetables in this skillet full of flavor, served over rice with fresh cilantro and a squeeze of lime juice.
Grilled Dijon Chicken and Portobellos. Marinated chicken breast grilled and topped with roasted red peppers, onions, portobello mushrooms, dijon sauce and aged white cheddar, served with steamed herb potatoes and seasonal vegetables. Chopped cilantro, served on a mix of grilled zucchini, marinated tomatoes, onions and red peppers with steamed white rice.
Cajun Shrimp Pasta. Tomato Basil Soup. Today's Soup with Any Meal. Caesar Salad. Triple Chocolate Meltdown. A magnificently moist chocolate cake topped with both dark and white chocolate. Its fudge-filled center will erupt upon first bite!
FILMFESTIVALS | 24/7 world wide coverage
Served with vanilla ice cream and hot fudge. Maple Butter Pecan Blondie. Chocolate Chip Cookie Sundae. A sundae we built for the whole table! Strawberry Cheesecake Dessert Shooter. Classic cheesecake, graham cracker crumbs, strawberry sauce and whipped cream make this one to savor. Chocolate Mousse Dessert Shooter. Hot Fudge Sundae Dessert Shooter. Delicious hot fudge drizzled over vanilla ice cream, topped with whipped cream and a maraschino cherry. Every day should be sundae. Oreo Cookie Shake. It's like having ice cream and cookies at the same time! Oreo Cookie Sundae.
Vanilla ice cream sundae topped with hot fudge, whipped cream, and Oreos. Don't you wish Mom made this at home? Afficher le menu complet. Ce restaurant convient-il pour un brunch? Oui Non Je ne sais pas. Ce restaurant est-il romantique? Cet endroit est-il un fast-food? Est-ce un pub? Ce restaurant propose-t-il le service en salle? Ce restaurant convient-il aux grands groupes? Merci pour votre aide! Filtrer les avis. Excellent 7. Moyen 5. Horrible 2. Type de voyageur. En famille. En couple. Voyage solo. Entre amis. Toutes les langues. Ces avis sont traduits automatiquement depuis l'anglais.
Afficher les traductions automatiques? We update our website as soon as OCI dates are finalized, in collaboration with other universities, relevant law societies and service providers. How will you learn about deadlines, tips, links, lists, employer events, related CDO events CV Clinics, Mock interviews , updates and more? By joining the relevant distribution list on myFuture, of course:. Sign up now! No need to wait until you receive your grades.
Mme Jobs, our beloved bimonthly newsletter, does not flood all students with information and reminders about specific recruitment processes — that is why you must sign up for your OCI process of choice. Please refer to the title of this article again! So you should plan on being in Montreal starting in mid-August.
Yes, this may interfere with your summer plans… time to prioritize! Eligible students interested in applying to these firms will need to demonstrate their sincere interest should they get an interview, so we strongly suggest they participate in this event as evidence! This includes activities such as legal clinics and clerkships. Keep this in mind if you're graduating in December and think you would like to take the New York Bar.
- Depuis 1978 au service de nos lectrices.
- Tredici maggio (Lamore ai tempi del web) (Italian Edition).
- Manitoba | sylimubulure.gq?
- A Huskey Boy and His Pants.
- H2 Heading.
Relevant information will be added to the CDO website and sent to the distribution lists as soon as it becomes available. We look forward to working with you throughout these processes should you hop in. If not, we want to remind you that we are also available if you want to discuss career options that fall outside the OCI process. It provides a productive and effective forum for McGill law students and law firms to get acquainted. We thank all of you for your generosity. We hope our MBLA Cares initiative, in some small way, has made a difference and that this mission will be continued in future years, making it part of a tradition of giving.
At this event, seasoned debaters and public speakers from universities around the world congregated for several intense days of competition. It was a multi-cultural and eye-opening experience as the tournament hosted 1, participants from 82 countries who shared a passion for constructive dialogue. All topics were fair game, with issues ranging from law to international affairs to finance. Most of our time was devoted to the competition, but who could resist the temptation of touring a European city?
And who could forget the German pretzels, beer and sausages! But the real meat was in those debate rooms, where speakers clashed about the European debt crisis, white collar crime, intellectual property rights and more. What am I required to wear to the C Call all ceremony and in court? T a abs. Who pays for my court attire? The cost of your cort attire is your responsibility responsibility. C Can an I rent basic basic court attire? If you decide to buy a gown and waistcoat from e yyear, ear, tthe H arcourts w ithin on he fe e iiss cre dited a gainst Harcourts within one fee credited against the purchase price from our regular price list.
When and how will I receive my ord order? Usually within 6 to 8 weeks. Combination Gown and Legal S Shirt hirt Front S Should hould you purchase purchase a gown and waistcoat from Harcourts within the against the purchase th year, yearr,, the th rental t l fee f is i credited cre purchase price from our regular price price list. Call us today at and allow us to show you how individual attention to detail characterizes Harcourts excellence.
Good news, everyone! Why not offer a mentorship program tailor-made for law students? Several months have passed and the idea has now blossomed into the brand new Alumni Mentorship Program. Sounds interesting? Wait until you hear all about it! Enough with the Latin. Some things are better taught outside of a classroom, and the best teachers are often those who have once stood where students are standing right now. Hence, mentoring is an ideal means of complementing formal legal education.
You must all be wondering: how much effort will I have to put towards getting an alumni to mentor me? The answer is surprisingly: very little! There will be no interview, no letter of intent and no alumni-stalking on your part. Pourquoi limite-t-on ainsi la participation au Programme? Mentorship for Dummies. Having a mentor is not a panacea to all your academic, professional and personal doubts and ills.
Mentors are not academic advisors, nor are they psychologists, therapists or tutors. In order to help you, they need to know about you and to feel that you are committed to your objectives. They are not friends you can just call when you are blue. They are not life coaches paid to pick you up and get you going. To wit, a study labeled lack of clear goals and absence of motivation as the number one turnoffs for mentors 1.
Think about it before you sign up. Once a mentor is assigned to you, you must take the helm. You are responsible for the relationship. Your mentor has a heap of knowledge he or she is ready to share with you. In order to get access to that precious know-how, you will need to think about your personal and professional goals.
We have prepared materials specifically designed to help you plan the relationship ahead. Everything will be made available to you at the time of registration. This article is merely a teaser. Students in their first year will be able to register in the summer semester via an online form available on the SAO website. Assistez aux ateliers de formation pertinents. Saisissez les occasions de rencontrer des anciens et des professionnels du milieu juridique.
Keep an eye on your emails to find out when the program will be launched. We are looking forward to counting you as a member of the first cohort of mentees this coming September. Make us proud! In addition, because student-initiated seminars are currently a topic of discussion at Curriculum Committee and students generally have shown much interest, we sought feedback to best understand and represent student opinions in the ongoing discussions.
We heard support for a robust presence of student-initiated seminars in the curriculum as a valuable space for student voices and engagement in a particular topic — including topics that have tended to be marginalized. It was raised that these seminars can help maintain a diversity of subjects and voices without exhausting limited Faculty resources. The Curriculum Committee is in the process of establishing a clearer set of rules for how student initiated seminars are to be administered, and clarifying the desired role of these seminars in the broader curriculum.
We will be bringing the student interests raised at the town hall into the committee's discussions and welcome any further feedback. Thank you again for coming! Attention 2Ls and 3Ls! Community Legal Clinics in Montreal are now recruiting students for the Summer , Fall , and Winter semesters. The Legal Clinic Course LCC gives students an opportunity to enrich their legal education through practical work experience in law-related fields. Students work in various community organizations and legal clinics providing legal information and assistance to socially disadvantaged individuals and groups.
Students are confronted with the social reality of access to justice and the interrelationship between legal concerns and economic, psychological, ethical and other social problems.
Book Corner 12222
The course also allows students to pursue work in organizations devoted to promoting and researching public interest law. Depending on the choice of organization, students will be exposed to a variety of legal areas. Interested in immigration or refugee law? Perhaps even paving the path for a McGill-Harvard truce, our delegation paid tribute to the reputation of McGill Law through numerous PR sessions and intense diplomatic debates. Although we did not earn one of the very few awards this year, it is safe to say that MLMUN achieved small victories within its committees.
In the Disarmament and International Security committee, amongst others, our delegates put their lawyerly discourse skills to good use by presenting thoughtprovoking speeches that made Cameroon a central player in the committee. Although the committee did not pass a resolution in the end, Cameroon worked hard in convincing the African Union of its national position, which was reflected in the preferred resolution. All in all, the McGill Law team left its mark in each committee.
Harvard was a challenging experience, for many the most demanding Model UN conference yet. An extremely realistic insight into the diplomacy aspect of International Law, Harvard National Model UN was for all a valuable preparation for potential careers in Public International Law.
We hope to continue expanding the team in order to allow more students this opportunity. Without its precious financial support, our team would not have been able to attend this extraordinary albeit costly conference. The contribution of the DDF allowed us to pay the price of travelling to Boston, thus enabling us to make priceless gains in new-found knowledge and memories. I, luckily, have no such requirements to respect, and am writing this for the sheer pleasure of sharing with you.
Thank you Boston. I am now employable. Not only was I not shunned by the female half of the Model UN conference for wearing sort of square shoes rather than nice round ones, I received compliments for those shoes. This definition being implied, of course. Why be explicit about the work expected?
Who thinks nights are for sleeping anyways? Point barre. Not that I could testify personally. But having seen more Marshall bags than UN Draft Resolutions being carried around by my co-delegates, I believe I must simply incline before this apparently universal truth I was asked to transmit. Granted, I could have Googled that one. Still, nothing beats the experience of finding a bronze bust of this notorious judge while wandering around the Harvard Law library. I was so eager to take a picture with it I almost knocked it off its pedestal.
This I discovered as our beloved driver attempted to engage on the obviously oneway exit belt of a highway. We all love you Marvin. But never do that again.
Applebee's, Hadley - Westgate Center Dr - Menu, Prix & Restaurant Avis - TripAdvisor
Being aware that not all young adults consider a board-game night to provide as much fun as a party, I tend to hide from others the fact that, well, I do. But facing the threat of a six-hour drive devoid of any source of entertainment beyond watching our pilot and co-pilot fight like an old couple, I dared to teach my road-trip buddies a little game.
Which we played for 3 straight hours. And kept every one of us awake for the entire drive. It makes you forget that others too might believe that contact is the best game ever. The event was well attended by students from within and outside the law faculty, as well as individuals in the community. Professor Bakht discussed the controversy of religious arbitration, which began in Ontario in , where a group of Muslims in Toronto decided Sharia law could be used to resolve family matters as per the choice of law provision in the Ontario Arbitration Act.
The uproar resulted in amendments to the Act making explicit that arbitration is allowed as long as the law of a Canadian jurisdiction is chosen. According to Professor Bakht this allows for much flexibility and religious arbitration is not actually outlawed. The panel discussed the interaction between religious divorces and Canadian law. Section When a Jewish man does not give a Jewish divorce to his wife, this results in the woman becoming an agunah, a chained woman, who cannot remarry.
Rabbi Whitman discussed that section The problem is that this section is not consistently applied by judges and lawyers. Rabbi Whitman said a halachic prenuptial agreement which requires the husband to give a get would solve the problem of agunah. If the husband is recalcitrant, then since Jewish law obligates the husband to support his wife financially and he still holds on to this marriage, he must give maintenance — a financial amount per diem. Secular courts in the US have been able to impose this financial payment.
However, Rabbi Whitman has been advised that a Canadian version of the agreement would not allow for a financial component. He believes that both Jewish law and Canadian law can work together to prevent further tragic situations of women unable to get a Jewish divorce. The panel expanded on the interaction between religious contracts and the law. A mehr in Islamic law is a dower given by the husband to the wife as promised in their marriage contract and payment is deferred until the couple divorces. Professor Ibrahim cited a Kansas case where anti-Sharia legislation impoverished the woman.
The woman getting a divorce due to domestic violence was able to get a divorce but not the dower, worth over half a million dollars. In another case in New York, a dower agreement between an American Muslim and Egyptian Muslim was enforced since there was no anti-Sharia legislation. However Professor Bakht argues that the question now is whether the contract must meet the heightened requirements of a marriage contract, or simply that of an ordinary contract.
As women and children are often left in poverty when a marriage is dissolved, she believes the dower is another important tool to combat poverty and that courts should make it as easy as possible for women to receive this amount through an ordinary contractual standard. One audience intervention raised the critique that many groups that promote application of other laws may be conservative, and therefore protection is needed against this.
In response, Rabbi Whitman said that it was important for there to be differences in opinion in the community for activism to bring out the best solutions in the end. Professor Ibrahim did not consider religious law to be a threat to Canada and that judges would, in any event, provide safeguards by overruling anything against public order.
Professor Bakht raised several important points: during the Ontario debate, some feminist organizations were concerned about vulnerable parties, and many Muslims felt that family arbitration was not of interest to them. However, others felt that by labeling them as a vulnerable party, there is the implicit assumption that women cannot make these agreements for themselves, despite being educated, born and brought up in Canada, and wanting to live their lives religiously.
It is unfair to assume that a woman would be duped and cannot consent. Courts have upheld these splits and there is not a question of fairness of the content so long as the process was fair: that parties were voluntarily entering the agreement and received independent legal advice. Professor Bakht expressed concern of over-policing religious couples when society does not do so for other couples.
Speak up and judge fairly; defend the rights of the poor and needy. CLF is a national not-for-profit, charitable organization with a membership consisting of law students, lawyers, judges, and law professors. Among other functions, CLF explores the complex interrelationships between the practice and theory of law and Christian faith. This was the first time the conference was held in Quebec. Ours is an ever-changing world fraught with moral dilemmas and issues that challenge our faith.
The education that we receive as law students gives us a privileged place and position in society and an opportunity to speak up and speak out — an opportunity which we must not — cannot — pass up. Barry Bussey, Vice-President Legal Affairs, Canadian Council of Christian Charities expounded on the theme, giving wisdom about speaking up in public and anecdotal advice. Simone Samuels, a law student at McGill, led in an animated discussion on mental health strategies for law students, and Russell Browne, executive director of CLF, spoke about mental health and clients.
Grace Mackintosh, legal counsel for the Seventh-day Adventist Church in Canada, spoke about religious liberty issues in elementary school curricula and Soorena Noori spoke about the Iranian church and the persecution of religious minorities in the Middle East. After Professor Margaret Somerville spoke about the legal issues and concerns regarding euthanasia, Me. Bob Reynolds, who served as an intervener for CLF in the Ginette Leblanc assisted-suicide case, expounded on the jurisprudence.
There was also much emphasis on fellowship and prayer. On Friday night, students and lawyers. Your voice can change the world. Several professors have introduced changes to their courses as a direct result of feedback they have received in this forum. The program has also supported initiatives in individual courses that have provided students with active learning experiences, ranging from field trips to visits from speakers who share on-the-ground insights about specific areas of law. At the level of Faculty-wide initiatives, the Ad Hoc Committee on Curricular Reform, which includes two student representatives, is rethinking the undergraduate program and the Clinical Legal Education Working Group is engaged in continuing reflections about how to disseminate information to students about the experiential learning opportunities offered by the Faculty.
The majority of our spending. The rest of our spending consisted of outreach efforts printing IM brochures , office supplies computer paper, printer ink, etc. Given our clients are incarcerated, we must communicate with them by regular mail. This money will go towards future IM conferences, outreach efforts, office and mailing supplies, and other expenses deemed reasonable by future Innocence McGill members and directors.
Thank you to the law school student body for their support of IM. For those interested in becoming a member of IM, sometimes we take on new members in the summer. Email innocence. For those interested in becoming a member in September, please check Notice Board and the hallways next fall. On March 20, , under the auspices of the McGill Arbitration Society, a group of about 25 students had the pleasure of an informal lunch session with Rachel Bendayan from Norton Rose Canada.
A McGill alumna, Ms. Bendayan spoke about her experience in litigation and in international arbitration, as well as her recruitment experiences as a student at the Faculty. Below are a few takeaways from her talk. Have litigation experience — Many firms have their arbitration groups in their litigation sections. This makes sense, as in both forms of dispute settlement counsel must argue their case and present relevant law and documentation.
Indeed, it is important to have litigation experience for arbitration, and doing smaller litigation files as a junior associate develops pleading skills which are a must for international arbitration, which. Arbitration involves a lot of writing — There is an enormous amount of writing in international arbitration e. Contrary to regular court proceedings, where there is relatively less paper as judges are familiar with the law at hand, arbitrators must be given everything they need to understand the arguments, any expert reports, and the applicable law.
Arbitrators are named from all over the world where different laws are applicable and may not be trained in the law applicable in a given case. And while there are several common frameworks for international arbitration and some arbitrators may have expertise in the applicable law, counsel in an arbitration will want to use briefs to explain law to the others to avoid any potential pre-. Interviews are sales pitches — When applying for jobs, such as during course aux stages, Ms.
Everyone says they want to do international law, so be open to experiencing everything and see what comes of it. Having both common law and civil law remains an advantage. Just remember, the interview is for you to sell yourself. Make sure you get to say everything you want to say about yourself as a selling point. It is with great pleasure that we announce the launch of volume 16 of Law Text Culture - an interdisciplinary, trans-continental legal journal based out of the University of Wollongong - entitled "Justice Framed - Law in Comics and Graphic Novels. However legal scholarship, even in the emerging field of law and popular culture, has yet to return the obsession, studiously ignoring the insight and opportunity comics provide for il-.
The goal of volume 16 was to begin to rectify this villainous oversight, and we feel this fantastic collection of essays, which we had the pleasure of co-editing, has accomplished just that. We owe a debt of gratitude to the Faculty of Law at McGill and our colleagues for the exceptional support we received.
First, the funding provided by the LSA and Dean's Discretionary Fund allowed us to both have a creative submission contest, the winner of which is published in the issue, and procure the necessary licenses to actually reproduce frames from discussed comics in the journal itself. A journal about comics without comics would have been a sad thing indeed; thank you for bringing colour and vibrancy to our pages. Second, many McGill profes-. Finally, Ian would like to take this opportunity to thank Professors Desmond Manderson and Mark Antaki, who provided invaluable feedback on his piece "The Legal Surrealism of George Herriman's Krazy Kat," which also appears in the volume.
The McGill curriculum currently does not include a course on Critical Race Theory, but changes in the legal landscape show the growing importance of race literacy. Despite the colorblind ethos prevalent in Canadian society, the often unspoken legacy of discrimination continues to adversely impact 'visible minorities' today. In , the United Nations Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination criticized Canada for it's use of the term 'visible minority' and issued a non-binding recommendation calling for the term to be removed from usage as it allegedly contradicted with the aims and objectives of the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination ratified by Canada in The committee argued that the term 'visible minority' seemed to suggest that whiteness was the normative standard and races differing from this norm were visible, thereby promoting discrimination.
The term 'visible minority' is a legal concept found in Canadian legislation and it has no comparable meaning outside of the Cana-. According to Statistics Canada, the term 'visible minority' is specific to the administration of the Employment Equity Act Act and refers to "persons, other than Aboriginal peoples, who are non-Caucasian in race or non-white in color".
The Act, which came into force in , aims to "achieve equality in the workplace so that no person shall be denied employment opportunities or benefits for reasons unrelated to ability and [ Is the concept of 'visible minority' ill suited to refer to the group the legislations aims to protect or is it simply a legal fiction that should instead be evaluated based on how well it achieves its objectives? The UN criticism of the term seems to echo the critical race theory idea that the law is not neutral, as it perpetuates the marginalization of people of color with its rhetoric of white dominance.
The discomfort with the use of a lexicon that seems to promote the racial power imbalances it claims to remedy highlights a larger problem articulated by Jennifer Nedelsky when she explains that "the ongoing problem of defining the term remains". When it comes to questions of race, power and law, the experiential knowledge informed by the personal experiences of the oppressed is often discounted in favor of legal abstractions that often reflect racial hierarchy.
Patricia Williams expressed the same sentiment when she stated in a footnote, "I don't like the word "minority" [ Even if the concept of 'visible minority' is a pure legal fiction, something assumed in law to be fact irrespective of the accuracy of that assumption, it is important to remember that the law is speaking to the experience of a particular group to avoid being blind to the negative unintended consequences on the object of the legislation.
The deliberate decision of the Canadian government to continue using the term 'visible minority' may be seen as a refusal to acknowledge the validity of the critical race theory criticism or an assertion of national sovereignty by rejecting the scrutiny of an international entity in its internal affairs. Although the textual argument against using a term that semantically seems to promote a certain racial hierarchy has some merit, it is important to remember that the 'visible minority' concept was established to be used as a tool to achieve employment equity.
As Mari Matsuda noted in her talk presented at the Yale Law School Conference on Women of Color and Law in , "it would be absurd to reject the use of an elitist legal system, or the use of the concepts of rights, when such use is necessary to meet the immediate need of [a disempowered constituency]. Esmeralda Thornhill reiterate this idea when she says, "though in matters of racism and racial discrimination we in Canada have experienced the law too often as a sword of oppression and so seldom as a shield of protection, law nevertheless remains too precious a tool for Black people to abandon".
Remedial measures are important in the Canadian legal context as they serve to address the consequences of a legacy of legal discrimination. The polemic arose because the Act establishes positive statutory rights calling for preferential measures to ensure the employment equity of 'visible minorities'. Critics of preferential measures argue that employment equity for 'visible minorities' creates reverse discrimination against members of the majority group, benefits certain minorities who do not require preferential treatment, devalue the contributions of 'visible minorities' and focus on representation instead of addressing the underlying problem of discrimination.
Responding to this argument, critical race scholars argue that in the absence of preferential treatment for visible minorities, white males will continue to benefit from the effects of the original discrimination. In addition, "formal equality, or a vision of equality premised on equal treatment of individuals, was rejected in favor of a substantive concept of equality in Andrews v.
Law Society of British Columbia. Nevertheless, these groups are still experiencing the cost of being members of a racialized community in a society that has not done away with white privilege. Although the question of who should be included in the 'visible minority' group is a societal decision, the. Unlike the American concept of affirmative action, employment equity in Canada does not impose quotas leaving the details of devising preferential measures to the employers thereby mitigating the unintended consequences of the 'visible minority' representation paradigm.
Ultimately, "the solution to systemic discrimination in employment cannot consist merely of measures that increase the representation of minorities in the workplace [ The Critical Race Theory student-initiated seminar was started in the winter term of by students to signal the importance race literacy and to highlight a need for the faculty to adopt a more comprehensive CRT approach to its legal curriculum. Often, students only encounter critical race theory in a very limited context, usually relegated to one lecture during the Foundations of Canadian Law.
There needs to be a more integrated and comprehensive approach that does not simply marginalize CRT as one discrete class topic, but rather an ongoing intersectional inquiry that asks: what is the best way to achieve equality in Canadian society for diverse racialized groups? A continued interjection and race literacy in all aspects of law is needed.
Aylward, Carol. Jennifer Nedelksy, "Reconceiving Rights as relationship" 1 Rev. Const Stud at 4. Patricia J. Esmeralda M. Colleen Sheppard, "Constitutional Equality: Challenges and Possibilities", chapter of a book that has not yet been published at Ibid at Canadian Constitution Act, , c Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Ibid Chabursky at Ibid Williams Moyse, to student who just answered question posed in class: I'm not saying you're wrong Peer-to-Peer: Horizontal Learning What if, then, we could construct a forum for sharing of our respective academic finds?
Along with the benefits of structure, the presence of credit and professor guidance, the stu- dent-led seminar acquires the merits of discipline and diligence. Transsystemia 2. I am filled with a particular McGillian pride whenever I reread it, specifically the passage: The goals of legal education under the transsystemic programme have expanded. The goal now is to create minds so agile and creative that they can think open-mindedly within alternative systems of thought, nimbly moving across and, as need be, transcending the boundaries of these systems.
And of course, at the graduate level, self-directed study is actually the norm. Why would a faculty tolerate student-ini- tiated courses rather than take pride in them, rather than actively encourage them by offering students credit for undertaking this extra challenge? Part of my reason for co-organizing this class was my need for a space where people would understand or want to understand me, the other part was the need to develop a vo- cabulary - a linguistic arsenal - that would allow me to articulate these thoughts in academic spaces No one claimed to have greater authority or knowledge than anyone else even though some had more familiarity with the subject matter than others.
Access to and space for multiple experiences offered dif- ferent ways of understanding the issue at hand and because it emphasised learning through the senses. In this class, we saw the limitations of the law while also unders- tanding in what spaces it could operate to protect racialized individuals. SISs provide a space for students to engage with the faculty about what they need from their legal education. For students of colour, marginalization is a fact of life in the greater Canadian politi- cal social world as well as at McGill's law faculty. Read on to avoid such a fate.
Here is what you should do in the following weeks: 1 Check your eligibility for OCIs US, Toronto, Calgary, Vancouver You will need to be in your second-to-last year or last year or semester of the regular B. Dates and participants do not vary drastically from year-to-year. Su ject to change Subject cha ch without notice. Matching You must all be wondering: how much effort will I have to put towards getting an alumni to mentor me?
So, where do I sign?